Atticism and Antagonism: How Remarkable Was It to Study the Sophists in Renaissance Venice?

AMAD

"Archivum Medii Aevi Digitale - Specialized open access repository for research in the middle ages"
To submission

Full metadata record

DC Field	Value	Language
Author	Gulizia, Stefano	-
Date	2019	-
Other Identifier	https://zenodo.org/record/2554126	-
Other Identifier	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2554126	-
URI	https://www.amad.org/jspui/handle/123456789/58971	-
Description	This article briefly investigates the reasons for Aldus Manutius’ inclusion of Alcidamas in his printed edition of Isocratean orations in 1513. These reasons have not been properly studied by historiography, even though the importance of the collection has previously been described. By systematically exploring three different levels of book production —the epistemic, material, and social ones— it seeks to understand how the career of the sophist Alcidamas in Renaissance Venice can be used as a useful case-study to represent Greek information management and printing in terms of network analysis.	-
Language	unknown	-
Rights	info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ; http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode	-
Keywords	Sophists.	-
Keywords	Aldus Manutius	-
Keywords	Alcidamas	-
Keywords	network theory	-
Keywords	antiquarianism	-
Dewey Decimal Classification	940	-
Title	Atticism and Antagonism: How Remarkable Was It to Study the Sophists in Renaissance Venice?	-
Type	publication-article	-
Type	info:eu-repo/semantics/article	-
AMAD ID	701805	-
Year	2019	-
Open Access	1	-
Appears in Collections:	BASE (Bielefeld Academic Search Engine) General history of Europe

Files in This Item:

There are no files associated with this item.